Twitter appears to have handled the addition of an edit button as well as it could have. With the addition of an edit history for each tweet and a prominent message indicating that a tweet has been altered, the edit button favors transparency. Users will only be permitted to update their tweet “a few times,” and they will only have 30 minutes to do so. In its testing, Twitter will undoubtedly pay close attention to those figures to determine just how editable tweets should actually be. Only paying Twitter Blue subscribers will be able to participate, and the test will initially be limited. Twitter appears to be in the right place and is using the utmost caution in this situation.

There is still a lively and contentious discussion on whether Twitter should feature an edit button. Will some users take advantage of the feature by fabricating or creating viral tweets, then changing them into problematic tweets that many users see? Of course. Would the majority of users use an edit button to make perfectly acceptable, every day platform improvements? Yep. The vast majority of users only want to fix mistakes, rephrase statements that are being misunderstood, and update their tweets as things change. May Twitter do enough to track and minimize the misuse so that it can be used for its intended purpose? The real query is that.

Read More

twitter-edit

Twitter has significantly accelerated the speed of its product development during the past few years. The business made a commitment to be more transparent about the ideas and experiments it was conducting, which it kept. Before they weren’t, fleets were going to be enormous. Twitter’s future, which reportedly now includes podcasts, is in spaces. For nearly an hour and a half, Twitter appeared to be completely behind newsletters. Amazing Follows! Tweet Stores! The new Twitter feature called Circle allows you to share content with only your closest friends and followers. There is a lot of information, making it difficult to determine how much Twitter cares about any of it.

This is beneficial in many respects because Twitter moved too slowly for more than ten years before releasing software at an outstanding rate. But Twitter is different from other social networks, that’s the issue. It’s more evenly dispersed. Many people see tweets as screenshots on cable news, many utilize third-party Twitter accounts, and many see tweets as embedded content on websites. Sure, you can embed Facebook posts and TikToks, but given Twitter’s position as the internet’s informational hub, the stakes for how tweets go around the globe are higher.

Twitter_edited

Making Twitter’s own app better is a part of the company’s recent product push to get more users to use it, view the advertising inside of it, and pay $5 per month for Twitter Blue. Adding extra auxiliary functions to its app is a tried-and-true platform tactic. The cultural impact of Twitter, however, still much outweighs the app’s actual user base. Over the next couple of years, Twitter’s reach is anticipated to increase once more because a presidential election is also approaching in the US. Accordingly, Twitter must make a feature stick outside of its own app if it wants it to be effective.

In a word, Twitter’s performance in that area has been horrible. Although the firm has made noises about being a better partner to third-party developers, many of them have grown weary of Twitter’s actions over the years and are unlikely to embrace its new initiatives right away. Additionally, the majority of the products the business has been developing and releasing aren’t even included in Tweetdeck, which Twitter itself controls.

It’s one thing for platforms and apps to not support particular add-ons or features, but the edit button essentially changes Twitter’s fundamental building block—the tweet—from its original design. If a single tweet might mean multiple things depending on where you are reading it, Twitter begins to resemble an unreliable source of information.

This will only grow more crucial if Twitter’s future is as a protocol rather than a platform. Since a few years ago, Twitter has made it clear that it wants developers to “lead the future of innovation on Twitter” and reexamine everything from the way the community functions to the way the algorithms function. To create an “open and decentralized standard for social media,” Project Bluesky was established within Twitter, and it is already developing technologies that would make it simpler to migrate postings or engagement between networks.

It’s encouraging that Twitter is making an effort to involve developers in the edit button. On Thursday, the company’s Twitter Dev account tweeted, “We recognize how vital it will be for you to have insight into modified Tweets, and we’re ready to give read-support for edited Tweet information via the Twitter APIs.” This is encouraging for both researchers and developers who will undoubtedly be interested in seeing how the edit button is used. However, Twitter still maintains that this is only a test, and it is risky for any developer to waste time pursuing every Twitter test.

It appears likely that Twitter will proceed and then roll out the edit button globally. It’s been the most often requested feature among Twitter users for years, the company likes to remind us, and it’s safe to assume that the majority of those people aren’t asking for it to cause havoc or facilitate bitcoin scams. If and when it does, Twitter will change because the tweet will change. And regardless of whether the corporation is prepared, it will alter things far beyond the Twitter app.

Read More:

 

Share.

Alex Hoffman-Ellis is a nerd who love technology and computers. He has been building computers for over 5 years now, and have always loved the challenge of learning how to make them faster, better, and more efficient. He's here to share his insights on these as a journalist, a designer and a technologist with love for writing and tech stuff. Words from Alex Hoffman: “Technology is best when it brings people together.”